Julian Assange is an editor from Australia that created the
Wikileaks website. This website allows various individuals to submit and
publish information that typically is deemed highly classified. This
information would generally never normally be seen by most, because it is
sensitive in nature, and is likely to refute information that governments tend
to change or cover up from the public. Since journalists operate under the 1st
Amendment, this has significant impact for writers and editors. Journalists
expect, that even if they receive a lot of criticism for a story, they will
still be given the freedom to speak their minds and report the truth, or their
version of it at least.
This story is
important to follow because it may be the catalyst for drawing a line down the
sand for what the government finds appropriate for civilians to publish
and read. The argument is that state secrets have been disclosed, which have
endangered the government, soldiers and even citizens. I have had a hard time
making my mind up about this issue since it became a controversy. On the one
hand, I think disclosing information about Afghans cooperating with the U.S.
most likely put those in extreme jeopardy. However, I cannot state that I side
with the government. Society is being given news and statistics from government
agencies that have political agendas and, therefore, it allows them to shape
the story or omit important elements. I have known this for a long time, which
makes hearing Assange’s information on his website that much more interesting.
Who better to know what is actually taking place in the government than the
inside personnel?
No comments:
Post a Comment